Forcing a plant-based diet onto the world
RootCause Dispatch #5
In a thread last week we drew attention to The World Economic Forum and highlighted the fact that this supra-national organization of un-elected bureaucrats are heavily pushing a plant-based diet as part of their ‘Great Reset’ agenda.
You may be wondering how this relates to RootCause Medicine and what we are trying to achieve on the ground – namely the liberation of the individual through a return to an ancestrally appropriate diet. Let me explain.
Since the early 1970s, there has been a global trend away from small scale animal agriculture and family farms towards large, corporate industrial mono-cropping operations. This change has been accompanied by the rise of ultra-processed plant foods and their imposition through regulatory capture of dietary guidelines. This shift has been highly profitable for a select group of people, namely the corporations and shareholders.
The losers have been rural areas, rural communities, food chain resilience, the soil and the health of the population. Farmers are increasingly pushed towards mono-cropping and high input farming methods by financial incentives and the need to survive. This has further accelerated topsoil loss and required ever larger quantities of industrial fertilizers, herbicides and pesticides. In the US, meat processing has become oligopolized into 4 major corporations, which has concerning implications for food security in the event of supply chain failure.
For those who are unaware, a plant-based / vegetarian or vegan diet is not the optimal diet human diet, despite what the The World Economic Forum, EAT-Lancet and the Harvard School of Public Health will tell you. The simple reason is it lacks key nutrients that enabled our evolution as Homo sapiens. Nor is a plant-based diet sourced from monocropped plants and grains optimal for the planet - check out the work of Paul Saladino and Frank Mitloehner to understand why.
So I bring attention to the World Economic Forum and their Great Reset Agenda to help people understand the forces at play. There is deliberate top-down effort to reduce your freedom of choice and steer you away from ancestrally appropriate animal foods.
You can decide for yourself why this is occurring – I think the simplest explanation (Occam’s Razor) is that a global plant-based diet best serves the corporate profit interests that control most aspects of society.
However, its interesting to note history is replete with examples of concerted efforts to force grain and plant-based diets onto the peasants while the ruling classes eat meat. Make of that what you will.
As always, we like to keep it real like a regeneratively grazed rib eye steak (done rare) and a glass of homemade organic goats milk kefir. Here are some actionable steps:
Wherever possible, buy your food directly from small scale family farms who use regenerative practices. They care about their animals and their land. Your health wins, the farmer wins, the animal wins, the planet wins.
Avoid purchasing processed food. It supports and enables destructive agricultural methods, financially empowers big corporations and wrecks your health. No bueno.
Start asking the important questions. Who benefits from a ‘Great Reset’? Who is Klaus Schwab? Why should he or the World Economic Forum have any influence on what you or your family eat?
The Rest Is Up To You...
August 9th 2021
Here some historical facts I gathered, supporting your claims:
1) For centuries in France, England etc the paysans were not allowed to hunt, only the aristocracy. The taking of wild animals was punishable by death or mutilation. By the way, the difference in words such as cow/beef, pig/pork etc comes from the French words being used to label the meat while the English word for the animal itself remained. The aristocracy spoke French and the peasantry had no need for words for the meat as they didn't get a chance to see/eat it. Again, a weak, sick, subservient class is easier to control. The wheat diet makes people know their place and more docile...
2) https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19227662/
"The prohibition of a meat diet, however, was not a result of the dissemination of Buddhism, but was because of orders from the rulers at the time. Animal meat and milk are ideal protein sources for humans, which most likely contributed to the physical buildup and stamina of caucasians.
Since around the Fifth Century AD, Japanese rulers began building government-run pastures in many places to raise horses and cattle, from which meat and dairy products were regularly supplied. [...] The Imperial Court also tried to discourage a meat diet as it did not want rice-growing peasants to consume meat. Samurai, the warrior-class people, however, regularly hunted for wild animals for their own consumption. [...] A meat diet was essential for the success of warlords of the era. [...] Milk and dairy products became popular in the 15th Century along with the introduction of Christianity to Japan"
3) The Comanche were as CARNIVORE as it gets —p. 48, Empire of the Summer Moon, S.C. Gwynn. Then they started to exchange their animal products for plants: their numbers quadrupled but their health degraded...
4) Gladiators were given a vegetarian diet: why would the Ancient Roman elite wastes valuable protein on slaves who were about to die? Beside, plants made them fat and that made the fights last longer:
https://archive.archaeology.org/0811/abstracts/gladiator.html
5) Agriculture made the Chinese weaker physically as per p. 87 from "Genghis Khan and the Making of the Modern World" by Jack Weatherford.
"Compared to the Jurched soldiers, the Mongols were much healthier and stronger. The Mongols consumed a steady diet of meat, milk, yogurt, and other dairy products, and they fought men who lived on gruel made from various grains.
The grain diet of the peasant warriors stinted their bones, rotted their teeth, and left them weak and prone to disease. In contrast, the poorest Mongol soldier ate mostly protein, thereby giving him strong teeth and bones. Unlike the Jurched soldiers, who were dependent on a heavy carb diet, the Mongols could more easily go a day or two without food."
Search for "Jurched soldiers":
https://www.cse.iitk.ac.in/users/amit/books/weatherford-2004-genghis-khan-making.html
6) "Largely vegetarian Bantu tribes such as the Kikuyu and Wakamba were agriculturists. Their diet consisted of sweet potatoes, corn, beans, bananas, millet and Kafir corn or sorghum. They were less robust than their meat-eating neighbors, and tended to be dominated by them." Dr Weston A. Price
From a Sally Fallon and Marry Enig's 1999 article:
https://www.westonaprice.org/health-topics/traditional-diets/out-of-africa-what-dr-price-dr-burkitt-discovered-in-their-studies-of-sub-saharan-tribes/
7) "Many Hindus are indeed vegetarian but many, including Brahmins, eat meat. In fact, for the warrior castes, meat was an important part of their diet, vital in building the physical strength needed for battle. It is the belief of one high-ranking caste, the Kayastha, that vegetarianism is for rabbits."
Sikhs (a religion born for its followers to become warriors against the Muslim invaders of the time) can eat meat.
"Dietary habits and dietary customs were factors that have played roles in the formation, evolution and development of Indian caste system.[9]"
"most Buddhists from the times of the Buddha until today are meat eaters. Theravada Buddhist tradition interprets the last meal of Buddha offered by Cunda to be pork"
It seems vegetarianism was used to fight Buddhism. It seems the Untouchables continued to eat beef. So, to "protect" Indians cohesion/identity/herd mentality/power/nation, did the Brahmins forbid to eat beef and those who did were treated badly becoming Untouchables.
From https://scroll.in/article/812645/read-what-ambedkar-wrote-on-why-brahmins-started-worshipping-the-cow-and-gave-up-eating-beef
8 ) Plato wrote in “The Republic” that the ruling class should limit the worker/slave class from eating meat, that meat should be reserved for them because it made one stronger both mentally and physically.
https://philosophersmag.com/essays/204-ancient-arguments-for-vegetarianism
9) "Besides malnutrition, starvation, and epidemic diseases, farming helped bring another curse upon humanity: deep class divisions. Hunter-gatherers have little or no stored food, and no concentrated food sources, like an orchard or a herd of cows: they live off the wild plants and animals they obtain each day. Therefore, there can be no kings, no class of social parasites who grow fat on food seized from others. Only in a farming population could a healthy, non-producing elite set itself above the disease-ridden masses. Skeletons from Greek tombs at Mycenae c. 1500 B. C. suggest that royals enjoyed a better diet than commoners, since the royal skeletons were two or three inches taller and had better teeth (on the average, one instead of six cavities or missing teeth). Among Chilean mummies from c. A. D. 1000, the elite were distinguished not only by ornaments and gold hair clips but also by a fourfold lower rate of bone lesions caused by disease.
[...] Thus with the advent of agriculture the elite became better off, but most people became worse off. Instead of swallowing the progressivist party line that we chose agriculture because it was good for us, we must ask how we got trapped by it despite its pitfalls."
https://www.discovermagazine.com/planet-earth/the-worst-mistake-in-the-history-of-the-human-race
---
Nowadays plants have been engineered for greater amount of sugars, carbs and unknowingly or not, toxins, making veggies and fruits less healthy, and we are advised to increase their intake and lower our animal products intake, which some doctors incorrectly think, results in early deaths from metabolic diseases like heart attacks, cancers, diabetes, obesity, depression, dementia etc BUT actually, those diseases rates have gone exponential since the introduction of vegetable oils and the inverted pyramid food! Here again, we are told the opposite of the truth...
------
The next battle I fear is to outlaw meat. Throughout history the overlords have thrived on meat while making the peasants survive on wheat. A weak, sick, subservient class is easier to control. Don't think it is not part of the agenda today. Whether for power or profit.
Many people are willingly adopting the poorer diet that our ancestors were forced to, but it is not a stretch to think we could be soon forced to it, for population control and/or over population curbing (Heck maybe through their vaccine passport and credit points). To also get rich on our backs: corporations don't want the money to go to regenerative farmers, there is more money to make by creating sugary crap and the tons of drugs needed to alleviate the many health consequences (and at the same time looking as if they are saving us! Just more virtue signaling grrr)
---
All this bad for me as I eat only animal products, like humans have been for 2.5 million years, before the advent of agriculture some 15,000 years ago. Don't fall for the lies that meat, the food that made us humans, notably by quadrupling our brains, is the cause of modern diseases like heart attacks, diabetes, cancers etc
I advice at least to stop eating seed oils aka vegetable oils.