PUBLIC HEALTH IN THE BIO-SECURITY POLICE STATE
Part II of V
This is the second of a five part series on the Bio-Security Police State.
Read Part I — Anatomy of a Bio-Security Police State.
The Bio-Security Police State has followed a very defined, selective and narrowly-scoped Public Health response to COVID-19.
Vaccination of the entire population, irrespective of individual risk of severe COVID, and despite failure of vaccines to induce sterilizing immunity, is the hallmark of this response.
Critically, the myopic fixation on vaccines has been to the exclusion of one of the most important facets of a holistic, multi-pronged and gold-standard public health response — early treatment.
Mass Vaccination
A policy of mass, coerced vaccination is inappropriate for a number of reasons.
Leaky vaccines
The suite of novel vaccines developed against COVID 19 appear to effective in reducing risk of severe disease and hospitalization in people at high risk1.
However, the vaccines are ‘leaky’ in that they do not offer sterilizing immunity against the SARS-COV-2 virus. The (multiple) vaccinated can still contract, transmit and suffer symptomatic and asymptomatic COVID-192. Vaccine-induced immunity is both short lived and less effective against novel viral variants3.
For these reasons, SARS-COV-2 vaccination can be viewed as a medical intervention akin to a drug or procedure that has a probabilistic chance of providing benefit depending on the individual. Similar to all medical interventions, vaccination comes with risk of adverse events, which must be weighed against potential benefit for every individual.
Novel vaccine technology
Vaccination is an important part of a gold-standard public health response to a pandemic virus. But when there is epistemic opacity surrounding long term safety, vaccines should be used cautiously and judiciously, focusing on those high risk people with the most potential benefit.
mRNA and viral vector vaccine technology relies on transfecting the recipient’s cells with genetic instructions to endogenously synthesize a specific viral component (the spike protein)4. This is a novel strategy that hasn’t previously been employed on a global scale.
Genetic vaccines differ to traditional vaccine platforms such as whole-pathogen vaccines (inactivated & live attenuated) and subunit vaccines5, which inject viral proteins directly, without forcing the body to synthesize the viral antigen.
Despite government mandates, genetic vaccine technology remains experimental and the long term consequences of (repeated) vaccination remain unknown.
Adverse events
Unfortunately, the novel vaccines are associated with a range of rare but significant vasculopathic6, thrombotic7 and cardiac8 complications at rates that greatly exceed that of traditional influenza vaccines.
Of most concern, Pfizer and Moderna vaccines are associated with heart inflammation (myopericarditis) in a group of patients that are at vanishingly small risk of severe COVID infection — young men.
In contrast to initial reports suggesting this was a rare complication, the real world incidence of vaccine-induced myopericarditis is likely to be closer to 1 in 3000-60009 (Israeli military cohort).
Importantly, this incidence is much higher than both the pre-COVID background rate of myopericarditis10 and higher than the rate of COVID-related myopericarditis in this demographic group11. In fact, several countries including Finland have ceased use of Moderna vaccine in men under 30 for this reason12.
The Uncalculated Risk vs Benefit Equation
It is clear that the risk vs benefit of COVID vaccination diminishes sharply for young, otherwise healthy people at low risk for severe disease, particularly young men and children.
Mandatory vaccination of the entire population, including the low-risk metabolically healthy, is inappropriate and responsible for iatrogenic harm in the form of over-treatment and vaccine-related injury.
It is unethical to compel the use of a non-sterilizing experimental vaccine in disregard of an individual’s baseline disease risk, especially when also denying them early treatment modalities and failing to educate them of the metabolic and nutritional risk factors.
Therapeutic nihilism of ‘Supportive’ Care
Supportive care
Falling ill with COVID in a Bio-Security Police State you will be offered ‘supportive care’. In effect, doctors will do nothing until you either recover spontaneously or become hypoxic, a state of severe disease associated with difficulty breathing caused by impairment of oxygen transfer in the lungs.
*In certain jurisdictions you may be offered Sotrovimab, an engineered monoclonal antibody of moderate efficacy that is given early in disease course but requires intravenous administration13.
At this stage of viral pneumonia an inflammatory cascade has already been initiated — your prognosis is poorer than if you had been treated early at the first sign of symptoms or evidence of viral positivity. You might then be treated with Remdesivir, another expensive novel, proprietary drug which appears to be wholly ineffective14.
The tragedy of the ‘supportive care’ approach is that no disease modifying intervention is initiated at the early stage of infection for the vast majority of people, where disease trajectory can be modified and severe disease prevented.
Early Treatment is Forbidden
Despite the prevailing beliefs of the medical orthodoxy in your local Bio-Security Police State jurisdiction, COVID can be effectively treated early in the disease stage using a combination of oral medications including the re-purposed drugs such as anti-parasitic drug Ivermectin.
Physicians including Dr Pierre Kory, a pulmonary and critical care specialist, have developed a multi-drug regime for early treatment based on lab evidence, cohort studies, observational studies and empirical patient treatment15.
The iMask early treatment protocol is a safe and effective multi-drug strategy that can prevent progression of mild COVID to severe COVID, thus reducing risk hospitalization and death.
In the Indian state of Uttar Pradesh, COVID infections and mortality plummeted precipitously with the widespread roll-out of early outpatient treatment using a multi-drug regime including Ivermectin16, and similar effect was noted in Japan17 once the ban on prescription of Ivermectin was lifted. Ivermectin is highly likely to be a significant contributory factor to this precipitous drop in viral transmission.
Such a bottom-up, tinkering, empirical approach was necessitated by the lack of time, resources and funding available to conduct long-term randomized controlled trials and the stifling pressure from the vaccine lobby and the Pharmaceutical industry against generic drugs.
Early treatment is vaccine agnostic
Notably, early treatment protocols are not exclusive of vaccination. Both vaccinated and unvaccinated stand to benefit, especially with waning effectiveness of vaccines against novel viral variants.
Despite clear signal of efficacy and absence of harm, early outpatient treatment is forbidden in the Bio-Security Police State. As Cardiologist and clinical trials investigator Dr P. McCullogh has stated, the current refusal to implement early treatment is pure therapeutic nihilism and the true cost is likely to be the 80% of the deaths in the US that were preventable.
Your Bio-Security Police State is also inclined to further selective ignorance of evidence and best-practice preventative medicine including:
Denial, or ignorance of the efficacy of naturally recovered infection (i.e natural immunity) in protecting against future infection as well as lack of benefit for vaccinating those who had a naturally-recovered infection18.
Denial or ignorance of the modifiable risk factors for severe COVID infection — including obesity19, metabolic dysfunction (insulin resistance / Type II Diabetes)20 and Vitamin D deficiency21 *see Part I —The Unspoken Metabolic Susceptibility Factors.
Muzzling of physicians
In the Bio-Security Police State it is effectively forbidden to raise questions of vaccine adverse events nor discuss the possibility that mass vaccination of all age groups with non-sterilizing genetic vaccines during the middle of an outbreak may have undesirable unintended consequences, or unknown long term consequences.
Censorship of physicians — both in terms of freedom to practice and advocacy for the use of safe, re-purposed medications — is another hallmark of the Bio-Security Police State. Any attempt to practice outside the State-sanctioned guidelines or espouse public opinion that runs counter to the mainstream narrative is punished, often with professional action and even medical license revocation.
Big Pharma and Regulatory Capture
The Public Health strategy of repeated, mass vaccination with novel genetic vaccines as well as the ban on prescription of re-purposed generic medicines and the insistence on late treatment with expensive proprietary antivirals simply reflects regulatory capture by the Pharmaceutical Industry over the Bio-Security Police State.
Some jurisdictions, including Australia, have freely admitted banning of the use of Ivermectin is intended to discourage people who otherwise would not get vaccinated22.
Financial conflicts of interest are rife in the Pharmaceutical regulatory bodies of the Bio-Security Police States. There is a revolving door between government and Pfizer and Moderna23 Additionally, at least 75 members of US congress own stock in vaccine manufactures, the same people that institute mass vaccination policies24.
*For the full sordid truth about the degree of regulatory capture by Big Pharma and the complete financialization of public health that ignores patient health for profit, listen to Dr Peter McCullogh’s interview with Joe Rogan.
The crux of the matter is that cheap, effective medications and early treatment strategies are being forbidden and suppressed so that more expensive, novel, proprietary drugs and vaccines can be sold. Early treatment has been black balled because it would severely infringe on Big Pharma’s monopoly on the sale of proprietary therapies to governments.
The hijacking of best practice public health is occurring because government policy and now clinical practice is dictated by the Pharmaceutical industry. This is the Medical-Pharmaceutical cabal of what I have termed the Medical-Pharmaceutical-Agricultural-Complex (MPAC).
The Bloodied Hands of the Bio-Security Police State
The best description of the Public Health response of the Bio-Security Police State is multi-faceted iatrogenic harm – both by omission and commission.
Millions upon millions of young people have been forced to take vaccinations that they didn’t need, with unknowable future consequences, and millions upon millions of metabolically broken, high risk people have been denied access to cheap, effective, early treatment.
Everyone has been denied the empowering information on modifiable risk factors for severe disease — namely metabolic disease and nutritional deficiencies.
The purpose of this part was to illustrate how far from gold standard the public health response the Bio-Security Police State has strayed.
In the next part of the series we detail the Enforcers of the Bio-Security Police State.
The Rest Is Up to You….
— RootCause MD
December 30, 2021
Thank you for reading Public Health and the Bio-Security Police State — Part II of V.
subscribe to the RootCause Journal of Medicine
follow @RootCauseDoctor on Twitter
contact me at rootcausemd (at) protonmail (dot) com
support my work with a bitcoin (BTC) donation: PayNym +divinerecipe394 or email above for a deposit address
Further Reading
Dr. Pierre Kory and the FLCCC Alliance
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33985964/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33956048/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34776011/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33279318/
https://www.niaid.nih.gov/research/vaccine-types
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34304601/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34639132/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34339728/
https://www.science.org/content/article/israel-reports-link-between-rare-cases-heart-inflammation-and-covid-19-vaccination
https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/acip/meetings/downloads/slides-2021-10-20-21/07-COVID-Su-508.pdf
https://brownstone.org/articles/myocarditis-under-age-40-an-update/
https://www.nst.com.my/world/world/2021/10/734595/finland-halts-moderna-vaccinations-young-men
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2107934
https://www.thennt.com/nnt/remdesivir-treatment-covid-19/
https://covid19criticalcare.com/ivermectin-in-covid-19/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eO9cjy3Rydc
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E1GF0H9V_1g
https://brownstone.org/articles/natural-immunity-and-covid-19-twenty-nine-scientific-studies-to-share-with-employers-health-officials-and-politicians/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7187148/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7205616/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33668240/
https://www.tga.gov.au/media-release/new-restrictions-prescribing-ivermectin-covid-19
https://dossier.substack.com/p/the-revolving-door-all-3-fda-authorized
https://www.businessinsider.com/lawmakers-bought-sold-covid-19-related-stocks-during-pandemic-2021-12?r=US&IR=T